segunda-feira, janeiro 26, 2009

To the international penal court, piece of the accusation process and prouve of the facts of violation not only free speech , but also civil rigths, that occured in the Saturday, twenty four of january, of this corrent year

This video has been removed due to terms of use violation

T hi s v id e i h as be en r emo ove ed d ue to te rm s o f use viol at ion


Violation , and violation use and terms of use violation, that is meaningless

Vi o l at ti on , and vi o l at ion use and te rm s o f use viol at ti on, t hat is me a ani n g l ess

This do not say anything

T hi sd o not sat a ny t h un g

This say already a lot

T hi s sa y al rea d y al ot violation

This say even more

T hi ss sa of the serpent of the delta on eve en mor e, ema sin

Ema here, is also the name of the tv company that have made the documentary in mozambique

Ema her es is al s ot he na me o ft he from french tv com p any t hat h ave mad e t he doc um en t ar y in mo z am bic, pen and bico ue

That only thing that is a fact associated with this sentence is the fact that someone had remove a video that i have record this Saturday with my speech, and thy to upload in the same day

T hat o nl y t h ing t hat isa f ac t associated press, ass circle soc cia ted, wi t h t hi s s en t en s e is t he f ac t t hat s om e ane from man ad reme eve anda av id eo t hat ti h ave record t hi s S at ur day wi t h m y sp ee c h

The sentense state that due the terms of violation, but dont especifie what are the terms and also why and in what way have them been violated

T he s en t e nse s tate t hat d ue t he te rm s o f vi o latino, but don t es pe cif fi e w hat ar e t he te rm s and al s o w h y and w hat w a y h eve t he m be e b viol t ad es

Terms normally aplly to agreements, in this case, a agreement made between mysef and you tube, if is not more proper and more correct to say, between me and my tube, as I already explain in this Book Of Life, the suspicus reazons that justifie this statament

Te r ms norma ll y ap l lie to agreements, in t hi s c ase and a a gre em en t mad e bet we en m y sef and y o u t ub e, e f is not pro per and mor e co rr e ct to s a y, bet we en m y and m y t ub e, a si al rea ad y e x p la in nin t hi s B ook O f Life, t he s us pei con rea zon s t h a j us tif fi e t hi s s tat a of the english man who is laying

Perhaps, even the terms, of something, are possible to be find and read somewhere around this internet application, certanaly in proper sujection with commun and general laws that are appley on this ground, wich are rigths of intelectual propriety and creation, diffuson and reproduction,

Per h ap da p from ps, eve en t he te rm s o f s om e t h ing ar ep oss ib le to be fi n da and rea ded s ome w her e ar o un d t hi sin t rene t ap p li cat ti ion, ce rta ana l y in pro per s u ject ti on w it h com m un and gene r la laws t hat ar e ap p l e y on t h is g ro un d, wi c g ar e rig t h s o f in tele ct ual pro p rie t y o f c rea ti on, du ff u son and r ep rod u c tio on

But to make demonstration of my case, cause and the justice of it, I d ont need to make a search and try to understand why, based in what arguments, verifing if they are in accord with what seem to be a fair claim, because this act, is the prove of abuse of power and also a violation of civil libertys and the rigth of free spech and free comunication in public space, as in this particular application, is the user thar in aperence define the universe of the viewers

But to m ak e demo ns t ration o fm y ca da sea and ca use and dt he justice of ot, u d ont ne ed k an w tom ak e t he sea arch anda t r y to un de r ank stand w h y m, ba sed in w h at tm ar gume n ts, v e rif inglish u ft he ar es ac cord inglesa w it h w hat se em to be a fair c l aim, pon t aria, b us t is in f ac t t he pr ove o f ab use o fp, portuguese futebol federation, o we rand al s o a viol a tio on circulo f of civil liber t y es and dt he riga t h o f fr ee sp e ch and fr ee com unica tio nin public spa ce, bec au use en t hi s ca se is t he use r t h a rin ap e rec n ce de fi ni e t he from universe o ft he vi we r s

I sated in apperence because in pratical terms, dont have the user nother the means or the tecnichal possibility of confirming and verify if a contence that he upload to the servidor of this company, are in reality, used on waht seem to be what the application, anda contrat provide, as the name claer indcated, your tube, is means, the user personal television, anda also because, in web exists links, anda ways to made downloads even im the more state of art methods of content protection, also because until now, they still exists a biga all on the subject of tracing contence and is utilization

Isa ted in ap per en ce bec a use in prat c al te rm s, don t h ave t he use r not her t he me ans o rt he tecnichal, p oss i bil it y o f c on fi r ming and v e rif y i fa conte n ce t hat he uplaad to the servidor o ft h hi s cm p any, ar e in rea l it y, use sed on w a h t se em tobe w hat the a pp lica tio n, anda, fernanda, contrat pro de vide, as t he na me clara andermatt., in dc a ted, y o ur do tube, do metro, do underground, is me an s, t he use r from personal television, and also anda of al s o bec au use in web, e x is ts l inc kapa s, anda w a y s to mad e do w n l o a ds eve en in the mor e from state o f art met h o ds o f c on ten t pro tec tio on, al s o bec a use un til no w, t he y still e xis ts a big a all on the s ub ject o ft rac inglhsh conte n ce and is u til z a tio on


This is also a question wich deals and margin, very imprtant questions to society, as freedom, and human rigths, and freedom and security issues, and is also a fact that until now there´s not a commun law on this matters, and also a fact that the web is world wild, wich is saying, that implies the fact that diferent laws apply to this equation, depending and varing in function of the country laws

T h isis al s o a q u es tio on wich de la dea l s and a mar do gin, v e r y i mp rt ant q ue s tio ns to s o cia t y, as fr ee dom, and human rigths, and fred dim and sec u rit y iss u es, and isa al s o a fat t hat un til no w th e rat en not a commun law on t hi s mat te r sand al s o a f ac tt hat t he we b is world wild, towers, wich is sa ying, chinese, t hat r efe ct ts t he f act t hat difer en t la w s ap p l y to q ue e duc ua tio on, de pen de and gan da v aria ang gin f un c tio n o f t he co un t r y das laws

And if this is a very simple question to solve, is not the necessesary to do it in this case, and also a part of it is done by this case it self in it presentation, and normaly lawers win big pay checks to do it, and also, this case of civil rigths and free spech, deals as all we know, with very importante global matters, war include, and the possibility that a father have or not to defend himself and is soon, from a real kidnaping that have been ocurred for the last threee years

Andi ft hi sis isa ave r y si mp e q u es tio n to sol v e, is not t he nec e sse sary to do it, in t hi s ca sa e sas, and al s o ap art is done b y t hi s case it self in it pr es ant a tio on and with norma l y lawers wi n bi gp a y che ck s to do it, and al s o t h is case o f c iv i l rigths and free spech, dea l sas all k no w, wi y h very i m porta ante from global mat te r s, war inc l u de, anda t he ps s ob bil it y t hat a father h ave o r not to d efe n d hi ms e l f and iss o on, fr om a rea l k u dna ping t hat h ave be en ocurred for the last threee years

And a will focus on this mostly important matter for this moment, and also I remeber that in this Book Of Life, I have already argue and rule a lot of questions concerning this, is subjects, and also i remember, that in sum, this it is for now, is bad for civil rigths, and freedom, and aslo dont allow the correct economic development, wich is the way of some to mantein the abuse, and the stil

And a wi ll from focus, on t hi s mos tç l y im porta mather, mat te r for t hi s mo men t, anda al s o, also, I reme be rt hat in t hi s B ook O f da Life, I h ave al rea d y ar g ue and ru lea l ot o f q ue s tio ns c on ce r ning t ho sis s ub ject ts and al s o i re men be rt hat in s um, t hi s it is for no w, is b ad for c iv i l rigths, and fr ee dim, and as l o don t all o w t he, co rr e ct e x c on o mic d eve lop men t, w u ch isa w at o f s om e man te e ning, t he ab use, ans serpente of the til in beringer, sound waves, anc viol

However a principle of basic right, is already, hurt by this way , and by the nature of this act, becasuse, we are in the presence of a contract beetween to entites, distint in is nature, pesonal individual and big companys, and only one part have ruled in a way that affect the oither in blind mode, and as all we know, blind mode hurts bladly justice and it is always a confimation that a abuse of power is pre figurate, or done

Ho we eve ra pric cp le, madrid, o f ba sic right, is al rea d y, hurt b y t hi sw a y , and bay t he n ar ur reo ft hi s ac t, bec asu use, we ar e in t he pr es sec ne o f a c on t rac t beet we en to en tite es, di st int in is na t ure, peso n al in di v u do sand big correio da manha cao, co mp any s, and on l y one p art h ave ru led in a w a y t hat a ff e ct the o it h a e rin of the blind, mode, and as all we k no w, b l in d mode h ur ts b l ad l y justice anda it is a l w a y sa c on fi mation t hat a ab use f p o we r is pr e figo rate

Why a have stated, that for the moment is, that i dont need to go check the agreemnets, for this main reason, firts, is, that even doing that im not sure that i arrived to a clear conclusion, or even worths that allows the possibility of defend my point of vue in just form, and consequentely my owns rigths, by the fact, that this action, is already consumated for and only by one of that parts that carry the agreement, and second, because, is the second time that it happens with this precice video, in other similar application, that provide a similar service

W h a y a h ave s tate red ted, t hat for the mo men ti don t ne e dt o g o che ck t he a g re em net ts, for to mai n rea sin, fi rt ts, is t hat eve en do ing t hat i major not sure t hat i ar r ive dt to a c lear c on c lu sio on, o r eve en w o rt ts t hat all o ws the ps s o ib bil it y o f d efe en dn d l y in just form, noe del that provides ladies models, m y p o in to f v ue anda co nse q ue en tely m y o w ns rig t h sb y t h a f ac t t hat t hi s ac tio ni s al rea d y c on s um mat ted for wave on dao on l y b y one o ft hat p art ts t hat carry t rea gre em en t, and sec on d, bec a use, is t he sec on dt time t hat it h ap pen ns w it h t hi s pr e cic e v id e o, in ot her si mila ar a pp lica tio on, t hat pro do vide a si mila ar service


As i have stated this Saturday in my blog, at blogspot company, by word writing, i have tried Saturday and Sunday to make the upload of the same contence, and this case is even worst that the one occurred with the you tube company

A si h ave s tate red ted t hi s Sat ur day in m y b lo g, at b l o g sp ot co mp any, b y word w rt ing, i h ave t rie ed S at ur day and Sunday to major ak , e t he up la o ad o ft he sam e conte en ce, and t hi s c ase as eve en w o r st ts t hat t he one o cc u r red w it h t he from you tube company, also meanig the metro explosion

Is a fact that recentely witha any kind of previous notice, the template, the form and consequently the use , have been changed for the provider, in a way that diminuish the power by the user to control what he, is doing in this application, and also a key a confimation, disapired, wich say, that the security issues that has provide to user security as been removed, who leads to the next question, why?

Isa sa f ac t t hat rec en tely w it h a any ki on dao f p pt r vi o us not ice, t he te mp la te, t he for m a and co nse q u en t l y t he use , h ave be e bn ch am ged for t he pro vi der, in a w a y t hat di min u is h t he power, b y t he use r to c on t rol w hat we, is do ing in t hi s a pp li ca t tio on and al s o a key, ac on fi mation, disa pe red, w c i h sa y, t he sec u rit y iss u es t hat w as pro vide to use r sec u rit y as be en r emo ove rd, w ho lea ds to t he next q ue s tio on, w h y foice

To allow others, to change contence wich that not belong to them, and in that way, create mistifcations about the true in facts there are there described, it the only logical conclusion, because, security, tends always to improve and not it reverse

To alloe all oe, ot her s, to c h ange conte en ce wich t hat not b elo first circulo ong to t he man din t hat w a y, c rea te mis tif cat tio ns ab o u tt he t rue in f ac ts t he rea ar e t he red es c rib bed, it t he on li l o gic cable lea al, c on c lui sio in, bec a use, sec u rit y,m t en ds al w a y s to i mp rove and not it r eve r se

put imediatly my video where i had it upload, respect my rigths, and the concer of million in world , about important matters about world subject in the fiel of war , peace, social organization, and information on crimes, and others kiss of love

Continua....